<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DailyApps &#187; acquisition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailyapps.net/tag/acquisition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailyapps.net</link>
	<description>One of the leading Technology Blogs in India.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>[Rejoice] Microsoft Finally Gives Up On Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/05/rejoice-microsoft-finally-gives-up-on-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyapps.net/2008/05/rejoice-microsoft-finally-gives-up-on-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Kastury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/05/rejoice-microsoft-finally-gives-up-on-yahoo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally it looks like Steve Ballmer and his team found too much of trouble running behind Yahoo for the past three months. Microsoft considers Yahoo to be its golden goose,... <a class="read-more" href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/05/rejoice-microsoft-finally-gives-up-on-yahoo/">Read The Rest &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="103" alt="microhoo" src="http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-content/uploads/Pics/MicrosoftFinallyGivesUpOnYahoo_1238F/microhoo.png" width="450" border="0"></p>
<p align="left">Finally it looks like Steve Ballmer and his team found too much of trouble running behind Yahoo for the past three months. Microsoft considers Yahoo to be its golden goose, and it feels that it will lay golden eggs in the future of online advertising.. I had written a post detailing <a href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/">What A Combined Microsoft Yahoo Looks Like</a> weighing all the pros and cons if this deal went through. Somehow Yahoo managed to push Microsoft to such an extent that it had no choice but to accept defeat. </p>
<p align="left">Now that Yahoo is staying on as an independent company, Jerry Yang and his team have some important tasks at hand. Let me reserve what exactly do they need to do for another post and focus on the ramifications of the breakout of this deal. </p>
<p>Microsoft issued a statement <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/may08/05-03letter.mspx">here</a><br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>“Despite our best efforts, including raising our bid by roughly $5 billion, Yahoo! has not moved toward accepting our offer. After careful consideration, we believe the economics demanded by Yahoo! do not make sense for us, and it is in the best interests of Microsoft stockholders, employees and other stakeholders to withdraw our proposal,” said Ballmer.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p><span id="more-1059"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/press/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=308131">Yahoo! responded</a> by issuing a statement<br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>“From the beginning of this process, our independent board and our management have been steadfast in our belief that <strong>Microsoft’s offer undervalued the company</strong> and we are pleased that so many of our shareholders joined us in expressing that view. Yahoo! is profitable, growing, and executing well on its strategic plan to capture the large opportunities in the relatively young online advertising market. Our solid results for the first quarter of 2008 and increased full year 2008 operating cash flow outlook reflect the progress the company is making.”</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Looking at the two statements, it is clearly evident that Microsoft sounds like a looser while Yahoo sounds like a clear winner either way you look at it. Considering that Yahoo already has a <a href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/04/yahoo-announces-search-advertising-deal-with-google/">search advertising deal with Google</a>, Yahoo should now focus on improving the services and increase the ad revenue across the board.
<p>With the Microsoft hurdle out of the way, I feel that there are more important Google and Yahoo tie ups on the way. This is just the beginning and from now on, Google has got some interesting times ahead, and it will be worth watching how Google dodges the challenges being thrown at it.
<p>Look out for a post soon, wherein I&#8217;ll be detailing as to what Yahoo needs to exactly do to stay clear and profitable in the future. I&#8217;m no guru but I love Yahoo and would never want it to go into the evil hands of Microsoft.
<p>What do you think about the fall through of this deal? What do you think is going to happen to Microsoft, Yahoo and Google as individuals? How do you think the Internet will react to this? Pitch in your opinion by dropping a comment.
<p>I <a href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/sign-a-petition-against-the-yahoo-acquisition/">never wanted to this deal to go through</a> and it looks its finally happening. Yay! I can&#8217;t be more happy for Yahoo than am right now <img src='http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyapps.net/2008/05/rejoice-microsoft-finally-gives-up-on-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Might Reject Microsoft&#039;s Bid Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/yahoo-might-reject-microsofts-bid-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/yahoo-might-reject-microsofts-bid-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 15:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Kastury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/yahoo-might-reject-microsofts-bid-tomorrow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal believes that Yahoo! will decline the $44.6 Billion Offer made by Microsoft to acquire it tomorrow. Should this happen tomorrow, it might set some wildfires tomorrow,... <a class="read-more" href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/yahoo-might-reject-microsofts-bid-tomorrow/">Read The Rest &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" src="http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/microhoo.png"></p>
<p align="left">The <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120257515426256541.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Wall Street Journal</a> believes that Yahoo! will decline the $44.6 Billion Offer made by Microsoft to acquire it tomorrow. Should this happen tomorrow, it might set some wildfires tomorrow, as this would probably be considered as a bold move by Yahoo. </p>
<p align="left">Yahoo has said that it will not consider any offer made by Microsoft under 40$ a share. Over a series of meetings, the Yahoo board believes that this offer seriously undermines the true value of Yahoo. If at all Yahoo pushes for atleast 40$ a share, this would mean another 30% premium for Microsoft, taking the potential bid to about 60$ billion. </p>
<p align="left">The timing of Microsoft&#8217;s Offer made one thing very clear and that was that it is trying to buy Yahoo for cheap. Looks like the Yahoo Board have decided to put up a bold face, and have decided to raise the bid price beyond the 40$ mark. Also the original Microsoft offer on February 1st has itself lost value, as the bid was half cash and half stock, and Microsoft&#8217;s Stock price has fallen nearly 13% in this period. </p>
<p><span id="more-960"></span></p>
<p align="left">I&#8217;m not very sure of what the Yahoo Board intends to do, but it does seem like, they want to be purchased by Microsoft after all. They are just trying to make a little bit more money on this deal. This also shows, just about how week Yahoo has become over the years. If they really wanted to say no, they would have said a firm <strong>No</strong>!</p>
<p align="left">While the true reaction of the Yahoo&#8217;s board will be known tomorrow, but at the moment the ball is in Microsoft&#8217;s court. They have two options, one is to raise the offer price, or else go for a hostile takeover. Either ways it looks like Yahoo might end up being the cat in Microsoft&#8217;s Lion kingdom. But I&#8217;d like to see Yahoo <a href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/">fight back</a> and fend off this acquisition, and take a new approach to their business and make themselves competitive again.</p>
<p>Michael Arrington from Techcrunch has an <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/09/microsofts-80-billion-and-growing-yahoo-headache/">interesting analysis</a> on this deal. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/yahoo-might-reject-microsofts-bid-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sign A Petition Against The Yahoo Acquisition</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/sign-a-petition-against-the-yahoo-acquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/sign-a-petition-against-the-yahoo-acquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Kastury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/sign-a-petition-against-the-yahoo-acquisition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think that the proposed Microsoft and Yahoo Merger isn&#8217;t all that good for the Internet Community as a whole. If you think Yahoo would rather live than die... <a class="read-more" href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/sign-a-petition-against-the-yahoo-acquisition/">Read The Rest &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" src="http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/microhoo.png" border="0" alt="microhoo" width="450" height="103" /></p>
<p align="left">If you think that the proposed Microsoft and Yahoo Merger isn&#8217;t all that good for the Internet Community as a whole. If you think Yahoo would rather live than die at the hands of Microsoft please sign the petition.</p>
<p align="left">I&#8217;ve already outlined just about all the reasons why this acquisition isn&#8217;t a good idea in my previous post <a href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>What Does A Combined Microsoft Yahoo Look Like</em></span></a><em>. </em>Please read it and consider signing the petition. The power is in the hands of us bloggers who could get the attention of mainstream media, and make the regulators rethink, and try and stop this deal from going through.</p>
<p align="left">Forget all the crap that Steve Ballmer said in his <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/feb08/02-01CorpNewsPR.mspx">press release</a>, incase Microsoft does go ahead with the deal, it gets nothing out of it. There is no way it can defeat Google by acquiring Yahoo, and it means that we see the end of Yahoo, one of most longstanding Internet companies out there.</p>
<p align="left">Please sign the petition over here</p>
<blockquote>
<p align="left">
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/sign-a-petition-against-the-yahoo-acquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Does A Combined Microsoft Yahoo Look Like?</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Kastury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot on the heels of the $44.6 Billion Offer made by Microsoft to Buy Yahoo, the web is going crazy with discussions on this. This deal if takes place, could... <a class="read-more" href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/">Read The Rest &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="center"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" src="http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/microhoo.png" border="0" alt="microhoo" width="450" height="103" /></p>
<p align="left">Hot on the heels of the $44.6 Billion Offer made by Microsoft to Buy Yahoo, the web is going crazy with <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/02/01/wow-microsoft-offers-446-billion-to-acquire-yahoo/">discussions</a> <a href="http://gigaom.com/2008/02/01/google-drives-microsofts-hostile-bid-for-yahoo/">on</a> <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-wants-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion">this</a>. This deal if takes place, could well be the defining moment of Internet in 2008. This deal has large ramifications, beyond just about you and me can think of.</p>
<p align="left">I&#8217;m not entirely sure, if this deal makes sense for Microsoft. The only reason Microsoft seems to be running behind Yahoo is to beat Google in Search and Online Advertising. The Bid seems to be a good deal for Yahoo, since the company has virtually been struggling for the past four years and 62% premium on the current value seems to be a good deal for the shareholders.</p>
<p align="left">But it raises some obvious questions. Every Acquisition has always had one side loosing itself. Take for example Google&#8217;s recent acquisitions. <a href="http://www.dodgeball.com/">Dodgeball</a>, <a href="http://jaiku.com/">Jaiku</a>, <a href="http://measuremap.com/">Measure Map</a> etc.. All these companies had to suffer the wrath of Google. But take <a href="http://youtube.com/">Youtube</a>, it was a competitor to <a href="http://video.google.com/">Google Video</a> at the time it was purchased, and Google had to take some tough decisions on what it should do with Google Video. Now we see Youtube and Google Video coexisting happily without interfering with each other.</p>
<p><span id="more-931"></span></p>
<p align="left">The Question is can Microsoft do this. For long we&#8217;ve known Microsoft to be a monopolistic company, with bigger than life interests. Let me ask you some questions here. I&#8217;d want all of you to comment on these questions that I&#8217;m putting up here..</p>
<ul>
<li>Windows Live search or Yahoo search?</li>
<li>Live messenger or Yahoo messenger?</li>
<li>Live spaces , Yahoo 360?</li>
<li>MSN Dating (Match) or Yahoo personal?</li>
<li>MSN advertising platform or Yahoo advertising platform?</li>
<li>.NET or JAVA?</li>
<li>Live ID or Open ID?</li>
</ul>
<p>Microsoft surely has some tough questions to answer, and speaking with reference to history, I think Microsoft would personally like to stick with its own services. This acquisition also raises questions as to what Microsoft plans to do with the poster childs of Web 2.0 namely <a href="http://flickr.com/">Flickr</a> and <a href="http://del.icio.us/">Del.icio.us</a>. It would do more harm than good to play around with them.</p>
<p>There is also one more thing that the Yahoo Board would have to consider incase they decide to go ahead with this deal. A lot more people could be loosing their jobs at Yahoo, considering the amount of overlap in the services that the two internet giants offer and with the parent company that is Microsoft giving preference to its own properties over Yahoo&#8217;s inspite of Yahoo Services being more popular.</p>
<p>In my belief the deal is not a good idea for the whole Internet as well. Microsoft has for long shed away from promoting Open Source and we all know that Open Source is the future of the Internet and proprietary technologies like ASP will never work. And what&#8217;s even more important is that Yahoo has been ramping up on the use of Open Source Technologies with services like Flickr, <a href="http://www.zimbra.com/">Zimbra</a>, Del.icio.us. So that&#8217;s again a point of differing interests of the two companies.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a combination of Yahoo and Microsoft is going to reverse Google&#8217;s increasing search dominance. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/94131390-e115-11da-90ad-0000779e2340.html">As Terry Semel said in 2006</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>My impartial advice to Microsoft is that you have no chance. The search business has been formed.</p></blockquote>
<p>He&#8217;s pretty much right, the search game is pretty much sealed, and Microsoft doesn&#8217;t have much of a chance here. Acquiring Yahoo would mean a lot of conflicts for Microsoft and its own services and its own technologies.</p>
<p>All in all I don&#8217; think this deal holds value for either Yahoo and Microsoft, except this is probably the answer to all the struggles Yahoo has put up with its Finances and Stock. Yahoo gets a boatload of money if this deal gets through and looses its identity that it has built up over the years. And What does Microsoft get, nothing at all. There is no way Microsoft can defeat Google by acquiring Yahoo simply because conflicts in the interests of the two companies is one too many.</p>
<p>What do you think about this deal? Yahoo still hasn&#8217;t said a Yes or No to the deal and their board must be taking some decisions as I speak. But all in all if this deal goes through, Yahoo would be the biggest looser and Google would only become stronger.</p>
<p>Please Yahoo, please say No. I don&#8217;t want any of the services that have come to define the Internet to die at the hands of Oppressive Microsoft. Please live on, and Live Free and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;d be able to get past all your recent troubles.</p>
<p>Please voice your opinions on this deal in the comments. We all need to discuss this, as it could forever change the landscape of the Internet.</p>
<p>Image Credit : <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/02/01/microsoft-wants-to-acquire-yahoo-for-446-billion">Mashable</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyapps.net/2008/02/what-does-a-combined-microsoft-yahoo-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automattic Acquires Gravatar</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/automattic-acquires-gravatar/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/automattic-acquires-gravatar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Kastury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/automattic-acquires-gravatar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am sure you have all seen some pretty avatars floating almost all over the web in countless blogs, forums etc&#8230; It was made possible thanks to efforts of Gravatar... <a class="read-more" href="http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/automattic-acquires-gravatar/">Read The Rest &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure you have all seen some pretty avatars floating almost all over the web in countless blogs, forums etc&#8230; It was made possible thanks to efforts of Gravatar (Globally Recognized Avatars), but offlate Gravatar seemed to have scaling issues with its amazing rate of growth. This is when it became an automatic choice for Automattic to acquire. Automattic with its vast experience&#xA0; with Server scaling and architecture thanks to <a href="http://akismet.com/">Akismet</a> and <a href="http://wordpress.com/">WordPress.com</a> are going to be of tremendous help to Gravatar.</p>
<p align="center"><img id="id" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="30" alt="Automattic" src="http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/header-logo.png" width="387" border="0" /> </p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t noticed here are some changes to Gravatar in the past few days since the acquisition : </p>
<ul>
<li>Automattic transferred the Rails application and most of the avatar serving to WordPress.com infrastructure and servers. </li>
<li>Avatar serving is now more than <strong>three times as fast</strong>, and works every time. </li>
<li>All the Premium Services like Multiple email id&#8217;s and avatars are now free. Everyone who paid for a premium account in the past 60 days will be refunded. </li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-639"></span></p>
<p>Well things are moving pretty fast at Automattic and Gravatar and the current focus seems to be on getting the Gravatar&#8217;s to load extremely fast and improve the performance of the site. Well Matt has chalked out even the future plans for Gravatar and here they are quoted from the <a href="http://blog.gravatar.com/2007/10/18/automattic-gravatar/">announcement he wrote</a> : </p>
<ul>
<li>Move the gravatar serving to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Delivery_Network">Content Delivery Network</a> so not only will they be fast, it&#x2019;ll be <a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/low-latency?nafid=22">low latency</a> and not slow down a page load. </li>
<li>Take the million or so avatars we have on <a href="http://wordpress.com/">WordPress.com</a> and make them available through the Gravatar API, to compliment the 115k already here. </li>
<li>From Gravatar, integrate them into all WordPress.com templates and bring features like multiple avatars over. </li>
<li>From WordPress.com, <strong>bring the bigger sizes (128px)</strong> over and make that available for any Gravatar. Currently Gravatars are only available up to 80px. </li>
<li>Allow Gravatar profile pages with <a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/Main_Page">Microformat</a> support for things like <a href="http://www.gmpg.org/xfn/">XFN</a> <code>rel=&quot;me&quot;</code> and <a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard">hCard</a>. </li>
<li>Develop a new API that has cleaner URLs and allows Gravatars to be addressed by things like URL in addition to (or instead of) email addresses. </li>
<li>Rewrite the application itself (<a href="http://site.gravatar.com/">site.gravatar.com</a>) to fit directly into our WordPress.com grid, for <a href="http://www.quantcast.com/p-18-mFEk4J448M">internet-scale</a> performance and reliability. </li>
</ul>
<p>Its nice to Open source world growing bigger and better. I would like to see what Matt and team can come up with for Gravatar, because it happens to be an extremely popular service and hopefully they won&#8217;t mess with it. Drop in your thoughts on this acquisition. Was it a good or a bad move by Automattic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/automattic-acquires-gravatar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Loves Jaiku and not Twitter</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-loves-jaiku-and-not-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-loves-jaiku-and-not-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karthik Kastury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-loves-jaiku-and-not-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this may come as a bit of a shock to you, Jaiku the microblogging service similar to Twitter has been acquired by the mighty Google. Well there were rumors... <a class="read-more" href="http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-loves-jaiku-and-not-twitter/">Read The Rest &#8594;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this may come as a bit of a shock to you, <a href="http://jaiku.com/">Jaiku</a> the microblogging service similar to Twitter has been <a href="http://www.jaiku.com/blog/2007/10/09/were-joining-google/">acquired by the mighty Google</a>. Well there were rumors about Nokia planning to acquire Jaiku but all that looks like it was just another rumor. The price of the acquisition has not been revealed as yet. I wonder why Google didn&#8217;t acquire Twitter, who are the leaders when it comes to Microblogging. When Google has no problems whatsoever when it comes to paying money for an acquisition, I fail to understand why Google didn&#8217;t acquire Twitter. </p>
<p align="center"><img id="id" style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="73" alt="Google Loves Jaiku" src="http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/gj.png" width="304" border="0" /> </p>
<blockquote><p>   <strong>According to Jaiku:</strong><br />
<blockquote>
<p><em>&#x201C;Exciting news: Google has bought Jaiku today.</em></p>
<p><em>What does that mean? First and foremost, we&#x2019;re of course continuing to support our existing users. So fear not: your Jaiku phone, the Web site, IM, SMS, and API will continue to work normally.</em></p>
<p><em>That said, new user sign-ups have been limited for the time being. The idea here is to enable our team to get right to work with Google&#x2019;s engineers on delivering a new, better service to you as quickly as we can instead of spending our efforts on optimizing the current back-end. Existing users will still be able to invite their friends, and those who are not yet on Jaiku can send us a request for an invitation to join.&#x201D; </em></p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><span id="more-563"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>   <strong>Why did Google acquire Jaiku?</strong>
<p><em>Activity streams and mobile presence are important areas where we believe Google can add a lot of value for users. Jaiku&#8217;s technology and talented team are a great addition to Google&#8217;s current application and mobile teams.</em> </p>
</blockquote>
<p>Reads the post from the Jaiku Blog. I would like to see Google work well with the Jaiku team to make it more popular. One thing that I would like to see Google do is take Jaiku places, so that we can update our status pretty much from anywhere in the world. Congrats to the Jaiku team, for doing an amazing job, and all the very best to Google. I hope Jaiku doesn&#8217;t face death similar to the ones we have already seen in Dodgeball, Urchin etc..</p>
<p>Via the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/reach-out-and-message-someone.html">Google Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-loves-jaiku-and-not-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 19/24 queries in 0.331 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via ninja.dailyapps.net

Served from: dailyapps.net @ 2012-05-23 22:11:01 -->
