<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Reasons Why the Mojave Experiment is Epic Fail!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/</link>
	<description>The Best Apps of the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:21:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-60920</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-60920</guid>
		<description>&quot;What Microsoft isn’t telling us… Vista (Mojave) has no plug n’ play!&quot;

I don&#039;t know why this was said. I had no problems at all installing Vista on a fresh system. Others have said likewise, with Vista being even less troublesome than XP in this area. For all it&#039;s faults, Vista seems fine on installation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What Microsoft isn’t telling us… Vista (Mojave) has no plug n’ play!&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why this was said. I had no problems at all installing Vista on a fresh system. Others have said likewise, with Vista being even less troublesome than XP in this area. For all it&#8217;s faults, Vista seems fine on installation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-60749</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-60749</guid>
		<description>Where were the antitrust police!?

What Microsoft isn&#039;t telling us... Vista (Mojave) has no plug n’ play!

That&#039;s right... No plug n&#039; play. Microsoft wanted software companies to pony up a fee to create and/or allow drivers to be made compatible for Vista.  Most companies said &quot;No way! I&#039;m not paying a fee to have you design my drivers... No way!&quot; There you have it the new number one reason why Vista is a failure, Microsoft corporate greed. Hang on to your Windows XP!

Kevin
Fort Wayne, IN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where were the antitrust police!?</p>
<p>What Microsoft isn&#8217;t telling us&#8230; Vista (Mojave) has no plug n’ play!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s right&#8230; No plug n&#8217; play. Microsoft wanted software companies to pony up a fee to create and/or allow drivers to be made compatible for Vista.  Most companies said &#8220;No way! I&#8217;m not paying a fee to have you design my drivers&#8230; No way!&#8221; There you have it the new number one reason why Vista is a failure, Microsoft corporate greed. Hang on to your Windows XP!</p>
<p>Kevin<br />
Fort Wayne, IN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Rational Human</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-55938</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Rational Human</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-55938</guid>
		<description>Codmister,

Your automobile analogy does not hold.  Buy a new car and drive it.  It does not take a series of lessons to do that.  You just DO it.   Also, if a new automobile needs fuel, you put ordinary fuel in it in the ordinary way.  You don&#039;t need special attachments and special fuel.  The fuel doesn&#039;t change so much in three years that you need to buy a new car and a new set of attachments for it. Learn to use one, you know how to use most ordinary automobiles.  Sure, there are some special ones that need additional learning but that is not the point.  For the ordinary person, a computer should be the same.  If he wants to do ordinary things AND he already knows how to do it, he should be able to do it without having to get a bloody graduate degree and buy a totally maxed out new computer to boot.

The stupidity is built into the design of OS&#039;s and the hardware it runs on and NOT in the user who has a life to live and simply wants to get some work done the way he knows how to do it.  Not  everyone is a bloody nerd who really doesn&#039;t have a life outside of his computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Codmister,</p>
<p>Your automobile analogy does not hold.  Buy a new car and drive it.  It does not take a series of lessons to do that.  You just DO it.   Also, if a new automobile needs fuel, you put ordinary fuel in it in the ordinary way.  You don&#8217;t need special attachments and special fuel.  The fuel doesn&#8217;t change so much in three years that you need to buy a new car and a new set of attachments for it. Learn to use one, you know how to use most ordinary automobiles.  Sure, there are some special ones that need additional learning but that is not the point.  For the ordinary person, a computer should be the same.  If he wants to do ordinary things AND he already knows how to do it, he should be able to do it without having to get a bloody graduate degree and buy a totally maxed out new computer to boot.</p>
<p>The stupidity is built into the design of OS&#8217;s and the hardware it runs on and NOT in the user who has a life to live and simply wants to get some work done the way he knows how to do it.  Not  everyone is a bloody nerd who really doesn&#8217;t have a life outside of his computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-55879</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-55879</guid>
		<description>&quot;It should instead focus on giving the power back to the user, in his own hands. Let him do as he pleases, after all its his PC.&quot;

Amen to that! I was so upset this morning when I came in after leaving Vista running an all-night job just to be welcomed by a message stating that Vista had run an important update that required an automatic restart of my computer.

It is my computer! I should be the boss of what it is doing, not Microsoft!
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It should instead focus on giving the power back to the user, in his own hands. Let him do as he pleases, after all its his PC.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amen to that! I was so upset this morning when I came in after leaving Vista running an all-night job just to be welcomed by a message stating that Vista had run an important update that required an automatic restart of my computer.</p>
<p>It is my computer! I should be the boss of what it is doing, not Microsoft!<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoMilla</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-35806</link>
		<dc:creator>JoMilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-35806</guid>
		<description>This is a really fair assessment. Anyone who disagrees has never owned a computer without a windows operating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really fair assessment. Anyone who disagrees has never owned a computer without a windows operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frab</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-34675</link>
		<dc:creator>frab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-34675</guid>
		<description>Behind the scenes from the real Mojave Experiment

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behind the scenes from the real Mojave Experiment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanG</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-34312</link>
		<dc:creator>IanG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-34312</guid>
		<description>Oh dear, announced today.Steven Sinofsky, the head of development for the desktop version of Windows, has said that Windows 7 on the PC side would not make major changes to things like the kernel and driver model, but has maintained that it would be a major release of Windows.
Vista all over again! Maybe this time they will make it so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear, announced today.Steven Sinofsky, the head of development for the desktop version of Windows, has said that Windows 7 on the PC side would not make major changes to things like the kernel and driver model, but has maintained that it would be a major release of Windows.<br />
Vista all over again! Maybe this time they will make it so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is it Game Over for Windows Vista&#8217;s Security? &#124; dailyApps</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-32898</link>
		<dc:creator>Is it Game Over for Windows Vista&#8217;s Security? &#124; dailyApps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-32898</guid>
		<description>[...] think its game over for the already struggling Vista?     SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &quot;Is it Game Over for Windows Vista&#8217;s Security?&quot;, url: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think its game over for the already struggling Vista?     SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: &#8220;Is it Game Over for Windows Vista&rsquo;s Security?&#8221;, url: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elephant</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-32692</link>
		<dc:creator>Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-32692</guid>
		<description>Your first point, about Microsoft treating customers as stupid, is completely irrelevant. You have not drawn a connection between this and why the Mojave Experiment is &quot;Epic Fail&quot;. Your second point is a hasty generalization based on no evidence - just speculation. The hardware point is also irrelevant at this point in time - any new computer can run Vista no probs.

You are &quot;arrogance at its best&quot;. Not Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your first point, about Microsoft treating customers as stupid, is completely irrelevant. You have not drawn a connection between this and why the Mojave Experiment is &#8220;Epic Fail&#8221;. Your second point is a hasty generalization based on no evidence &#8211; just speculation. The hardware point is also irrelevant at this point in time &#8211; any new computer can run Vista no probs.</p>
<p>You are &#8220;arrogance at its best&#8221;. Not Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codmister</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-32500</link>
		<dc:creator>Codmister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2008/08/5-reasons-why-the-mojave-experiment-is-epic-fail/#comment-32500</guid>
		<description>@ Rational Human: I&#039;m sure that&#039;s true. I&#039;m sure there are users who do know things that I don&#039;t know. However, keep in mind computers aren&#039;t simple.

&quot;They are stupid simply because they don’t know what you know, can’t do what you do, and want to do things their way rather than yours.&quot;

I don&#039;t think I ever told users to do things my way. I don&#039;t them expect them to. If they want to go through the start menu to open an application or create a shortcut on the desktop, who am I to judge? I prefer keyboard shortcuts, but I never once told users: this is how I do it. I simply made the point that the average joe may not know the requirements of Vista, how it works, etc.

And those users aren&#039;t stupid because they don&#039;t know what I know. They&#039;re simply uneducated. Computers are complicated pieces of machinery that like most things these days, need time, patience, and assistance to learn. Why do you think most schools nowadays require students to pass a computer competency test? It&#039;s not easy to grasp, especially if that person isn&#039;t technology minded. Not everyone is good at computers, nor knows how to use one. From your statements, I would assume in this matter you&#039;re just as arrogant as Microsoft, however on the opposite side of the spectrum.

&quot;The problem is correctly identified as stupidity but its not the user being stupid that’s the problem. The user simply wants to get some real work done with a minimum of hassle and is justifiably frustrated when he is forced to go through totally unnecessary hoops. THAT is not stupid.&quot;

The same can be said about a motor vehicle. People buy a car with an automatic transmission because they don&#039;t know how to drive a manual, or can&#039;t be arsed with it. However, many average joes and janes don&#039;t know how to check their transmission fluid or their oil, and end up taking their vehicles to dealerships for repairs and maintenance. It&#039;s exactly like a computer. If there&#039;s a problem, jane will often take her Dell to Geek Squad or a similar service. Like a vehicle, people should really learn how to check the basics of their computers, and learn what their getting into. I still abide by my argument, in that truly, many Vista haters simply hate Vista because of word of mouth. If someone sat down with them and taught user the basics of Vista, they&#039;d be just as happy with it as XP, regarding the fact that they computer they buy can run it just as fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rational Human: I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s true. I&#8217;m sure there are users who do know things that I don&#8217;t know. However, keep in mind computers aren&#8217;t simple.</p>
<p>&#8220;They are stupid simply because they don’t know what you know, can’t do what you do, and want to do things their way rather than yours.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I ever told users to do things my way. I don&#8217;t them expect them to. If they want to go through the start menu to open an application or create a shortcut on the desktop, who am I to judge? I prefer keyboard shortcuts, but I never once told users: this is how I do it. I simply made the point that the average joe may not know the requirements of Vista, how it works, etc.</p>
<p>And those users aren&#8217;t stupid because they don&#8217;t know what I know. They&#8217;re simply uneducated. Computers are complicated pieces of machinery that like most things these days, need time, patience, and assistance to learn. Why do you think most schools nowadays require students to pass a computer competency test? It&#8217;s not easy to grasp, especially if that person isn&#8217;t technology minded. Not everyone is good at computers, nor knows how to use one. From your statements, I would assume in this matter you&#8217;re just as arrogant as Microsoft, however on the opposite side of the spectrum.</p>
<p>&#8220;The problem is correctly identified as stupidity but its not the user being stupid that’s the problem. The user simply wants to get some real work done with a minimum of hassle and is justifiably frustrated when he is forced to go through totally unnecessary hoops. THAT is not stupid.&#8221;</p>
<p>The same can be said about a motor vehicle. People buy a car with an automatic transmission because they don&#8217;t know how to drive a manual, or can&#8217;t be arsed with it. However, many average joes and janes don&#8217;t know how to check their transmission fluid or their oil, and end up taking their vehicles to dealerships for repairs and maintenance. It&#8217;s exactly like a computer. If there&#8217;s a problem, jane will often take her Dell to Geek Squad or a similar service. Like a vehicle, people should really learn how to check the basics of their computers, and learn what their getting into. I still abide by my argument, in that truly, many Vista haters simply hate Vista because of word of mouth. If someone sat down with them and taught user the basics of Vista, they&#8217;d be just as happy with it as XP, regarding the fact that they computer they buy can run it just as fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
