<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Security Threat &#8211; Google is vulnerable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/</link>
	<description>One of the leading Technology Blogs in India.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 07:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: songshanshan</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>songshanshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 07:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>UGGs boots are such a popular boots over the Eurasia, and is now blowing a fashion wind in the world. The originality, credibility and super-luxurious comfort will make you crazy. As the weather gets colder and colder, there are many &lt;a href=&quot;”http://www.uggs118.com”&quot; title=&quot;”UGGs”&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UGGs&lt;/a&gt; boots on sale for people. It is the best shoes for the cold winters.&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGGs boots are such a popular boots over the Eurasia, and is now blowing a fashion wind in the world. The originality, credibility and super-luxurious comfort will make you crazy. As the weather gets colder and colder, there are many <a href="”http://www.uggs118.com”" title="”UGGs”" rel="nofollow">UGGs</a> boots on sale for people. It is the best shoes for the cold winters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lihu Gelem</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Lihu Gelem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 04:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>Vista sucks, long live Windows7 - &lt;a href=&quot;http://open-bank-account.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://open-bank-account.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista sucks, long live Windows7 &#8211; <a href="http://open-bank-account.com" rel="nofollow">http://open-bank-account.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: security &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox Security Threat - Google is vulnerable</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>security &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Firefox Security Threat - Google is vulnerable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeusExVerra</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1890</link>
		<dc:creator>DeusExVerra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1890</guid>
		<description>Fixed in Firefox 2.0.0.10:
&quot;MFSA 2007-37  jar: URI scheme XSS hazard&quot;
(among other things)

No longer an issue apparently. This sounds more like a fault of Java/User ignorance or carelessness than it does Mozilla if you ask me. I don&#039;t see why Java is still in active development. From the perspective of a web developer and a net surfer, its a waste. Eats ram, slow as hell, doesn&#039;t perform any real task that can&#039;t be accomplished without it (and it can usually be accomplished FASTER without Java). And then there&#039;s all the JRE&#039;s and crap that take up disk space.

Such a waste. NoScript, Adblock, and the All-in-One Sidebar are definitely the best FFox Extensions out there. (Ffox Extension Backup and IeTab also deserve mention). NoScript is a bit of pain to set up at first, but after you&#039;ve established a decent &quot;whitelist&quot; It&#039;s painless :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed in Firefox 2.0.0.10:<br />
&#8220;MFSA 2007-37  jar: URI scheme XSS hazard&#8221;<br />
(among other things)</p>
<p>No longer an issue apparently. This sounds more like a fault of Java/User ignorance or carelessness than it does Mozilla if you ask me. I don&#8217;t see why Java is still in active development. From the perspective of a web developer and a net surfer, its a waste. Eats ram, slow as hell, doesn&#8217;t perform any real task that can&#8217;t be accomplished without it (and it can usually be accomplished FASTER without Java). And then there&#8217;s all the JRE&#8217;s and crap that take up disk space.</p>
<p>Such a waste. NoScript, Adblock, and the All-in-One Sidebar are definitely the best FFox Extensions out there. (Ffox Extension Backup and IeTab also deserve mention). NoScript is a bit of pain to set up at first, but after you&#8217;ve established a decent &#8220;whitelist&#8221; It&#8217;s painless <img src='http://ninja.dailyapps.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;Steve

“”&quot;This exploit was known to Mozilla for quite sometime and hasn’t still patched it. Given that this vulnerability affects both Google and Firefox lets see who gets this patched first.”&quot;”&quot;

It may be fixed very soon as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403331#c18 is patched on the mozilla1.8 branch (&lt;behind Firefox 2.0.0.*) as Bug 369814 depended on 403331.&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;

Bug 369814 is now marked fixed so Firefox 2.0.0.10 will have the fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;"&#8221;Steve</p>
<p>“”&#8221;This exploit was known to Mozilla for quite sometime and hasn’t still patched it. Given that this vulnerability affects both Google and Firefox lets see who gets this patched first.”&#8221;”&#8221;</p>
<p>It may be fixed very soon as <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403331#c18" rel="nofollow">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403331#c18</a> is patched on the mozilla1.8 branch (&lt;behind Firefox 2.0.0.*) as Bug 369814 depended on 403331.&#8221;"&#8221;"</p>
<p>Bug 369814 is now marked fixed so Firefox 2.0.0.10 will have the fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nofmeister</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nofmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>First, I wanted to say THANKS for the heads up on Firefox!

Also, I don&#039;t see what the big debate is.  All programs will have security holes at some point.  All Firefox has to do is to work on having the best browser out there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I wanted to say THANKS for the heads up on Firefox!</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t see what the big debate is.  All programs will have security holes at some point.  All Firefox has to do is to work on having the best browser out there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevitivity</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevitivity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>Karthik Kastury said &quot;The problem with Firefox is that is Open Source. It’s both a boon as well as a bane for Mozilla. By being OpenSource its got a huge population of developers who are ready to fix anything that pops up, but at the same time not the safest code is produced during development.&quot;

So Open Source software is less secure?  I starting to seriously question this blog as this is a statement of pure stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karthik Kastury said &#8220;The problem with Firefox is that is Open Source. It’s both a boon as well as a bane for Mozilla. By being OpenSource its got a huge population of developers who are ready to fix anything that pops up, but at the same time not the safest code is produced during development.&#8221;</p>
<p>So Open Source software is less secure?  I starting to seriously question this blog as this is a statement of pure stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco Vaj</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Vaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>there is definite trend right now toward relaxing browser and dom security restrictions

it&#039;s called web 2.0

soon hacker will be able to change one little image or embed on one little website and this will lead to thousands of client users with widgets on their desktop or phone that subscribe to feeds of feeds of feeds of widgets of scrapes of feeds of mirrors of a repost of that image on a social networking site post in a completely unrelated news article where the top commenter of the story uses the altered image/link as his avatar having the entire content of their gmail yahoo live ebay warcraft and digg accounts forwarded to a single hacker email address.

can you understand hacking in 2007? we can: http://xssworm.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is definite trend right now toward relaxing browser and dom security restrictions</p>
<p>it&#8217;s called web 2.0</p>
<p>soon hacker will be able to change one little image or embed on one little website and this will lead to thousands of client users with widgets on their desktop or phone that subscribe to feeds of feeds of feeds of widgets of scrapes of feeds of mirrors of a repost of that image on a social networking site post in a completely unrelated news article where the top commenter of the story uses the altered image/link as his avatar having the entire content of their gmail yahoo live ebay warcraft and digg accounts forwarded to a single hacker email address.</p>
<p>can you understand hacking in 2007? we can: <a href="http://xssworm.com" rel="nofollow">http://xssworm.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myztry</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1885</link>
		<dc:creator>Myztry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1885</guid>
		<description>Nothing compares to that spit dribbling certifiably insane Microsoft idea of allowing ActiveX code to run based on a yes/no/install response.
Since the hijacking of the Browser market, developers have been required to implement stupid ill-conceived functionality in the name of compatibility.
Microsoft has been a leader in the same manner as George Bush. There&#039;s just no distinguishing them from the enemy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing compares to that spit dribbling certifiably insane Microsoft idea of allowing ActiveX code to run based on a yes/no/install response.<br />
Since the hijacking of the Browser market, developers have been required to implement stupid ill-conceived functionality in the name of compatibility.<br />
Microsoft has been a leader in the same manner as George Bush. There&#8217;s just no distinguishing them from the enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillIsGay</title>
		<link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1884</link>
		<dc:creator>BillIsGay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyapps.net/2007/11/firefox-security-threat-google-is-vulnerable/#comment-1884</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t download anything God Damit!!!!! and make sure don&#039;t let firefox unzip anything that you have downloaded. Plus uninstall those addons and use firefox like any other web browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#8217;t download anything God Damit!!!!! and make sure don&#8217;t let firefox unzip anything that you have downloaded. Plus uninstall those addons and use firefox like any other web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 13/18 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via ninja.dailyapps.net

Served from: dailyapps.net @ 2012-05-21 13:10:13 -->
